Editorial & Review Policy

Last updated: August 31, 2026

Editorial purpose

Kaptain Money covers career decisions, money mindset, psychic services, intuition, astrology, manifestation, and related spiritual topics. Our aim is to be useful, readable, transparent about limits, and respectful of readers’ ability to make their own decisions.

Facts, interpretation, and belief

We distinguish among verifiable facts, interpretation, personal experience, and spiritual belief. Psychic abilities, astrology, manifestation, energy work, numerology, and similar practices are not presented as scientifically established prediction, diagnosis, or treatment methods. Definitive claims require appropriate evidence; belief-based material should be labeled or framed accordingly.

Financial, career, health, and safety claims

We do not promise money, jobs, promotions, investment returns, lottery winnings, cures, diagnoses, or guaranteed outcomes. Content should encourage qualified professional help for high-stakes financial, legal, medical, mental-health, or employment matters.

Service reviews and comparisons

When we discuss a service, relevant criteria may include pricing transparency, terms, ease of use, reader safeguards, disclosure practices, cancellation information, support access, and warning signs. Coverage may not include every provider. Listings are not guarantees, certifications, or personalized recommendations.

Affiliate relationships

Commercial relationships may influence which services are available for us to cover, but they should not justify unsupported claims. Affiliate relationships are explained in our Affiliate Disclosure.

AI-assisted content

Automated tools may assist with research organization, drafting, editing, or quality checks. Material remains subject to human editorial responsibility. AI output is not treated as a source of truth, and factual claims should be checked against appropriate sources when accuracy matters.

Updates and corrections

We may revise content for accuracy, clarity, safety, links, formatting, or changed provider information. Substantive corrections should be made promptly when identified. Readers can report a possible error through our contact page and should include the page URL and a clear description of the concern.

Historical content

Older articles may remain available when they retain context or reader value. Where an article is outdated, duplicative, or no longer representative of our standards, we may update it, add context, use search-index controls, or point readers to a more current page rather than deleting the historical record.